Explorer token info and logo update service

What does an explorer token information update cover?

An explorer update organizes the public-facing token details, logo and social links that a project wants associated with its token page. We coordinate the preparation and submission work for Etherscan, BscScan, Solscan or Tonviewer, based on the network and request you specify.

This is useful when a token page has incomplete project information, an outdated visual identity, or social destinations that need to match the current official channels. It is also a practical step after a rebrand, provided the team has confirmed which details are current. If the change involves a contract migration, scope the related work separately through contract migration and rebranding updates.

The deliverable is not simply a logo file. It is a coherent set of details checked against the project’s approved source material, plus a record of what was prepared and submitted. For broader context on directory and profile work, see listings and verification.

Before kickoff, identify the exact network, token contract address and explorer page. This prevents the team from preparing information for a similarly named asset or an obsolete page.

Which explorer should the update target?

Target the explorer that corresponds to the token’s network and the page your audience is expected to inspect. The service can cover Etherscan, BscScan, Solscan or Tonviewer; tell us which one is relevant and share the exact token address so the scope is unambiguous.

A project may need more than one explorer when it operates across networks or has distinct token contracts. Treat each chain and contract as a separate review target: confirm the address, the name and symbol used in public materials, the official logo, and the social destinations intended for that asset. Do not assume that an update on one explorer automatically changes another explorer’s page.

For each target, our review aligns the submitted information with the project’s own approved sources. We can also flag inconsistencies for your team to resolve before submission, such as a website that points to a different brand or a social account that is no longer official. If wallet display is also part of the project’s checklist, review wallet logo and token list inclusion as a separate scope.

The practical decision is straightforward: send the explorer page and contract address for every requested network, then confirm whether the task is a first information request or a correction to existing details.

What should the team prepare before submission?

A complete intake lets us check the request against one approved record instead of reconciling conflicting messages. We use a kickoff checklist to distinguish what the project provides from what MegaSatoshi prepares and reviews.

The client provides:

• The network name, contract address and explorer page for each target.
• The approved token name, symbol, description and any other requested public details.
• The current logo file and the official website and social URLs to display.
• Confirmation of who can authorize the request and any evidence or account access the platform requires.
• A point of contact who can approve wording and respond to questions.

MegaSatoshi prepares:

• A structured information set for the selected explorer or explorers.
• A consistency check across the token details, logo, website and social destinations.
• A submission-ready package and coordination of the agreed request.
• A status record noting what was sent, what remains pending and any response requiring client input.

The named quality-control step is the pre-submission review: we compare each field with the source materials approved by your team and return discrepancies for confirmation rather than silently choosing between versions. If the project also needs a separate review of its circulating supply presentation, see circulating supply verification.

How does the explorer update process work?

The process moves from scope confirmation to a checked submission, with the client approving the information that will represent the project. Each stage has a clear owner, so the team can see whether an action is with us, the client or the explorer.

First, we confirm the target explorer, network, contract address and type of change. Next, the client supplies the approved token details, logo and official links using the kickoff checklist. We then run the pre-submission review and share any mismatches for written confirmation. After approval, we coordinate the request through the relevant explorer’s available process and record the submission status.

The completed handoff includes the final information set, the record of the request and any platform response received during the engagement. If additional clarification or materials are requested, we identify the specific item the team needs to provide and coordinate the agreed follow-up. A project that needs profile corrections beyond explorer pages can compare the scope with DEXTools and DEXScreener profile updates.

Timing is planned after we know which explorers are involved and whether the team has complete source materials. Keeping approvals in one contact channel and returning requested evidence promptly helps avoid preventable pauses.

What can the explorer decide after submission?

Explorer publication is subject to the individual platform’s process, so the project team should treat submission and publication as separate milestones. Our work is to prepare and coordinate the agreed request, not to make decisions on behalf of Etherscan, BscScan, Solscan or Tonviewer.

The explorer may review the information, request clarification or decline to make a change under its own criteria. We cannot promise acceptance, a particular publication date, or that every requested field will appear exactly as supplied; those decisions and page displays are outside our control.

To make the request easier to assess, keep the evidence and wording aligned with the project’s public sources. Before approval, check that the contract address is copied from the explorer page, that each URL leads to an official project destination, and that the logo is the approved version rather than a draft. If a request is returned, preserve the platform’s exact feedback and respond to the point it raises instead of resubmitting unchanged materials.

For projects already dealing with an inaccurate or inconsistent profile, listing profile remediation may be a better starting point than a straightforward information update. We will confirm the service scope before any work begins.

How should explorer updates fit into a listings plan?

Explorer information is one part of a project’s public reference layer. Keeping the name, logo and official links consistent there can support a cleaner handoff when the team is preparing directory submissions, exchange discussions or other profile work; it does not replace those separate application processes.

Plan the explorer update when the project has settled its token identity and can approve one canonical set of details. If a rebrand or contract migration is still being decided, resolve those inputs first so that the team does not submit a version that will soon become outdated. For a wider sequence of directory work, use the listings and verification overview to identify related tasks, including CoinMarketCap listing support or CoinGecko listing support.

For an efficient first review, send the explorer page URL, network and contract address for each target, then attach the approved logo and official website and social links. Add the project’s confirmed token name, symbol and description, and identify the person authorized to approve the final package. MegaSatoshi will check the scope and materials, return any specific gaps, and confirm the next action with your team.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Confirm targetsShare the explorer page, network and contract address for each requested update. We confirm the agreed platform scope before preparing materials.
2. Collect approved detailsProvide the current token information, logo, official URLs and any authorization or evidence the request requires.
3. Run the pre-submission reviewWe compare the package with your approved sources and ask you to resolve inconsistencies before submission.
4. Submit and trackAfter your approval, we coordinate the agreed request and record the submission status and any platform response.
5. Close the handoffWe share the final information set and identify any follow-up materials needed from your team.