ScamAdviser trust score improvement for Web3 projects

What does the ScamAdviser trust score assess?

ScamAdviser rates websites automatically using public signals associated with a domain and its website. Our first task is to identify which visible details may be affecting the project’s profile and which of them the team can address.

The review covers the signals named in the service scope: domain age and registration data, hosting location, SSL certificate, site content, contact details, business registration, reputation across blacklists and user reviews. We compare what is publicly visible with the information the project can substantiate, rather than treating the score as a standalone verdict on the business.

The output is a prioritized findings list. It distinguishes between a site correction, a missing or unclear business detail, and an external record that needs a separate review or correction request. This helps the team assign each action to the right owner and avoid changing accurate information just to alter a score.

If reputation across review platforms also needs attention, see Trustpilot profile and reputation management. For a broader view of services that address platform profiles, visit promotion on platforms.

Which ScamAdviser trust signals can your team improve?

Your team can improve the completeness, consistency and technical hygiene of the information visitors can see on the website. We map each finding to a specific action, confirm the proposed correction with the client and then document the change.

Typical remediation areas include:

• Confirm that the SSL certificate is present and the site uses clean, consistent redirects.
• Make the company name, contact details and relevant business information easy to find.
• Review whether privacy policy and terms are visible and aligned with the project’s actual operation.
• Check site content for outdated or risky material that should be corrected or removed.
• Identify a potentially mistaken blacklist entry and prepare the information needed to request its correction.

The aim is a coherent public-facing record, not a cosmetic rewrite. Our Compliance Review checks that proposed changes are supported by information the client can verify and that site copy does not make unsupported claims. For related profile and verification work, see listings and verification. ScamAdviser remediation focuses on the website and its public signals; it does not replace legal, security or registry advice.

What should the client prepare for a ScamAdviser review?

A useful review needs the domain and a reliable source for the project’s business and contact information. We prepare the audit structure and findings record; the client supplies authoritative details and confirms which corrections are accurate.

What we prepare

• A review of the public website against the signals in scope.
• A prioritized list of visible inconsistencies, missing details and technical hygiene items.
• Proposed corrections for the client to approve, followed by a record of completed work.
• A draft re-check request with supporting context where an external record appears mistaken.

What the client provides

• The domain and the project’s preferred contact for the review.
• Correct company or business registration details, where applicable.
• Approved contact information and the policies or terms the project intends to publish.
• Confirmation of who can make website, domain or hosting changes, and approval of any proposed content edits.

We capture scope and responsibilities in a Mandate Letter before work begins. This gives the project a clear record of what we will review, what requires client approval and which actions depend on access or documentation from the project. It also keeps the review anchored to accurate, approved information rather than assumptions.

How does a ScamAdviser audit move from findings to re-check?

The engagement proceeds from an agreed scope to a review, client-approved corrections, a re-check request and a written report. Each stage is recorded so the team can see what changed and what remains open.

First, we confirm the domain, the project contact and the signals in scope. We then review public-facing information and share findings for client validation. Once the client approves the proposed corrections, we coordinate the agreed site updates or provide clear instructions for the responsible team. Where the review identifies a potentially mistaken blacklist entry, we prepare a correction request using the relevant supporting information.

Before submission, a Quality Gate checks that the agreed fixes are recorded and that the request reflects the project’s verified details. The final report notes the work completed, the re-check request and the score visible at the time of reporting. For an overview of working arrangements, see how MegaSatoshi works.

To keep the process efficient, nominate one person who can approve factual details and route technical changes. If several teams own the website, domain and company records, identify those owners at kickoff so requests do not stall between departments.

What is outside a ScamAdviser remediation mandate?

The service can correct project-controlled website signals and support a request to review information that appears mistaken. ScamAdviser calculates its score automatically, so the score itself cannot be purchased or set by an agency; a young domain also builds trust with time.

For governance, separate delivery evidence from the platform outcome. The delivery record should show the agreed audit, corrections made, client approvals and the re-check request; the reported score is an observed result, not a substitute for that evidence. This distinction makes it possible to assess the quality of the work even if a platform record has not yet reflected a change.

Before approving a correction, check that the underlying detail is accurate and that the project is authorized to publish it. If a listing or external reputation record is involved, retain the supporting business information and a copy of the request for the project’s own records. Our report makes the completed actions and outstanding external items visible, so the project can make a clear follow-up decision without confusing a submitted request with a resolved record.

How should a Web3 project start ScamAdviser remediation?

Start with the domain, the current public business details and a short description of the trust issue you want reviewed. We use those materials to confirm scope and identify which details need client validation before a remediation plan is approved.

ScamAdviser work can sit alongside other project communications, but each channel has a different job: this service addresses public website and domain signals. Keep the website’s business information consistent with the details used in your project materials, and assign an owner to approve any changes. If you also need publication or profile support, our platform services provide a wider view of available work.

The report is designed to be usable after the engagement: it records findings, corrections, the re-check request and the observed score. That gives your team an orderly reference for internal review and future updates. To begin, send MegaSatoshi your domain, the business details you can verify and any specific ScamAdviser concern; we will review the scope and outline the next actions.

How it works

1. Confirm scopeShare the domain, project contact and the specific trust concern. We confirm which public signals and actions are included.
2. Review public informationWe compare the visible site and domain details with the signals in scope, then present findings for client validation.
3. Approve and correctThe client confirms accurate business details and approves proposed edits. We coordinate agreed corrections or provide instructions to the responsible team.
4. Prepare the re-check requestWe document completed changes and prepare supporting context for the request, including any apparently mistaken external entry.
5. Report the outcomeWe provide a record of work completed, the re-check request and the score visible at reporting.